Does UBIFS NAND ECC info get stored in OOB?
Steve deRosier
derosier at gmail.com
Fri Jan 2 10:12:05 PST 2015
Hu,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:15 PM, hujianyang <hujianyang at huawei.com> wrote:
> On 2014/12/31 3:44, Steve deRosier wrote:
>> I'm starting to assume that you're simply saying that UBIFS itself
>> doesn't use the OOB area, nor even handles the ECC itself, but that's
>> up to the chip driver layer. And that the driver will handle the ECC
>> and OOB as appropriate. Am I correct?
>>
>
> Yes, you are right.
>
> UBIFS doesn't directly write to OOB area. MTD or nand controller is
> responsible to the data management in OOB area.
>
Thanks for your answer, I was looking to see if I interpreted it right
and it looks like that's the case.
> I think the announce "neither UBIFS nor UBI use OOB area" is compared
> to the filesystem which directly write data to OOB area across the
> interface provided by lower layer. For example, Yaffs2? I not sure
> of it.
>
I have no clue. I'm glad that UBIFS doesn't use OOB for it's own
meta-data because I'm about to up our ECC strength to 8-bit, which
will take up nearly all the OOB area. I was just worried that it
meant that it was keeping and doing ECC elsewhere, and I wanted to
know how it was doing that.
Thanks,
- Steve
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list