[PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding

[Florian Fainelli]

On 02/12/15 12:02, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 02/12/15 19:38, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> 2015-12-02 11:05 GMT-08:00 Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com>:
>>> + Broadcom list + Kamal
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 08:19:37PM -0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
>>>> Add device tree binding for NAND on the BCM63268.
>>>>
>>>> The BCM63268 has a NAND interrupt register with combined status and enable
>>>> registers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon at fire.lp0.eu>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt      | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
>>>> index 4ff7128..f2a71c8 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
>>>> @@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ we define additional 'compatible' properties and associated register resources w
>>>>         and enable registers
>>>>       - reg-names: (required) "nand-int-base"
>>>>
>>>> +   * "brcm,nand-bcm63268"
>>>> +     - compatible: should contain "brcm,nand-bcm<soc>", "brcm,nand-bcm63268"
>>>
>>> Looks like you're aiming to support bcm63168? Is bcm63268 the first
>>> chip to include this style of register then? The numbering seems
>>> backwards, but that may just be reality.
>>
>> 6362 (NAND rev 2.1, ann. Sep 8, 2009), 6368 (v0.1?!?, ann. Jan 7,
>> 2009) and 6328 (v2.1, can't find release date) are earlier chips that
>> have an identical combined interrupt enable + status register and a
>> NAND controller within the same 32-bits word, so these would qualify
>> as a better compatible string for this specific addition integration
>> stub here. I would gowith 6368 here then?
>>
> 
> I could change it to 6368 but there's no documented NAND_INTR_BASE for
> it. Only the 63268 and 6818 have a #define for NAND_INTR_BASE.
> 

It looks exactly the same as the 63268 layout, and double checking, this
appears to be a v2.1 controller as well, it was not just properly
documented as such.
-- 
Florian