[PATCH mtd-utils 00/11] flash_{un,}lock upgrades
Brian Norris
computersforpeace at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 15:34:21 PDT 2015
Hi,
I've done a bit of work to make the flash_lock tool more useful, in order to
help test some new SPI NOR block protection features. Of note:
* added getopt support
* further unified flash_unlock and flash_lock -- the only difference now is
their default feature, and both binaries contain support for all features
* add support for MEMISLOCKED, so we can query arbitrary regions for
protection status
* mtdinfo -M already can dump some block lock information, but you get a
little more flexibility using flash_lock --info, so both seem worth having
IMO
Unsolved issues:
* the MEM{LOCK,UNLOCK,ISLOCKED} ioctls all still use the out-dated 32-bit
erase_info_user struct, which means they'll have problems supporting >=4GB
flash. This isn't a mtd-utils problem, per se, and at the moment, Linux NAND
(the only (?) candidate for >=4GB flash) support doesn't implement any of
the locking APIs. But just an observation I ran across.
* Deprecation plan: it would make sense to deprecate and remove flash_unlock
eventually (in favor of 'flash_lock --unlock'), but this isn't really
pressing, so I don't see a good reason to spend much effort on it.
Enjoy,
Brian
Brian Norris (11):
flash_{un,}lock: nest optional parameters in help message
flash_{un,}lock: switch to getopt library
flash_{un,}lock: support --version flag
flash_{un,}lock: document option flags
flash_{un,}lock: abstract the argument positions
flash_{un,}lock: move args processing to its own function
flash_{un,}lock: support both lock/unlock in the same binary
flash_{un,}lock: add MEMISLOCKED support
flash_{un,}lock: improve strtol() error handling
flash_{un,}lock: don't allow "last byte + 1"
flash_{un,}lock: document block count == -1
flash_unlock.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 156 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--
2.5.0.457.gab17608
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list