[PATCH v2 20/35] ubifs: implement IO functions for quota files
Dongsheng Yang
yangds.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com
Thu Aug 6 20:24:50 PDT 2015
On 08/04/2015 05:46 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 30.07.2015 um 07:48 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
>> We have to implement 3 functions to support quota in ubifs:
>> ubifs_quota_read(), ubifs_quota_write() and ubifs_get_quotas()
>>
>> ubifs_quota_read():
>> callback to read quota file.
>> ubifs_quota_write():
>> callback to write data to quota file.
>> ubifs_get_quotas():
>> callback to get quota instance for inode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ubifs/super.c | 219 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 219 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
>> index bc57685..3609d7b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
>> @@ -940,6 +940,220 @@ static int check_volume_empty(struct ubifs_info *c)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>> +static ssize_t ubifs_quota_read(struct super_block *sb, int type, char *data,
>> + size_t len, loff_t off)
>> +{
>> + struct inode *inode = sb_dqopt(sb)->files[type];
>> + unsigned long block = off >> UBIFS_BLOCK_SHIFT;
>> + int offset = off & (sb->s_blocksize - 1);
>> + int tocopy = 0;
>> + size_t toread;
>> + char *block_buf;
>> + struct ubifs_data_node *dn;
>> + int ret, err = 0;
>> +
>> + toread = len;
>
> Minor nit, please group same types together and also group assignments
> as other UBI/FS codes does.
Hm, okey. Good suggestion.
>
>> + dn = kmalloc(UBIFS_MAX_DATA_NODE_SZ, GFP_NOFS);
>> + if (!dn) {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + block_buf = kmalloc(sb->s_blocksize, GFP_NOFS);
>> + if (!block_buf) {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto free_dn;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (offset) {
>> + /* Read the un-aligned data in first block */
>> + tocopy = sb->s_blocksize - offset;
>> + if (toread < tocopy)
>> + tocopy = toread;
>
> min()?
okey, thanx
>
>> + ret = ubifs_read_block(inode, block_buf, block, dn);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret != -ENOENT) {
>
> if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)?
Yea, agree.
>
>> + err = ret;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(data, block_buf + offset, tocopy);
>> +
>> + block++;
>> + toread -= tocopy;
>> + data += tocopy;
>> + tocopy = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + while (toread > 0) {
>> + tocopy = sb->s_blocksize < toread ?
>> + sb->s_blocksize : toread;
>
> min()?
Yes, correct.
>
>> +
>> + /* Break to read the last block */
>> + if (tocopy < sb->s_blocksize)
>> + break;
>
> Hmm, can't you combine this check with the above condition?
Sure.
>
>> + ret = ubifs_read_block(inode, data, block, dn);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret != -ENOENT) {
>
> See above.
Thanx
>
>> + err = ret;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + block++;;
>
> superfluous semicolon.
Oh, right you are.
>
>> + toread -= tocopy;
>> + data += tocopy;
>> + tocopy = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (tocopy) {
>> + /* Read the data in last block */
>> + ret = ubifs_read_block(inode, block_buf, block, dn);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret != -ENOENT) {
>
> See above. Maybe the -ENOENT stuff can be integrated into ubifs_read_block().
> All callers deal with it the same way...
Good point. Will try it.
>
>> + err = ret;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(data, block_buf, tocopy);
>> + }
>> +free_buf:
>> + kfree(block_buf);
>> +free_dn:
>> + kfree(dn);
>> +out:
>> + if (!err)
>> + return len;
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t ubifs_quota_write(struct super_block *sb, int type,
>> + const char *data, size_t len, loff_t off)
>> +{
>> + struct inode *inode = sb_dqopt(sb)->files[type];
>> + unsigned long block = off >> UBIFS_BLOCK_SHIFT;
>> + struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
>> + int offset = off & (sb->s_blocksize - 1);
>> + union ubifs_key key;
>> + int tocopy = 0;
>> + size_t towrite = len;
>> + int ret, err = 0;
>> + struct ubifs_budget_req req = {};
>> + int new_block = 0;
>> + struct ubifs_data_node *dn;
>> + char *block_buf;
>
> See above.
>
>> + /* There are dirtied blocks and new blockes, but we call them all
>> + * new blocks here, the budgeting is same for them.
>> + */
>> + new_block = DIV_ROUND_UP(len - (sb->s_blocksize - offset), sb->s_blocksize);
>> + if (offset)
>> + new_block += 1;
>> +
>> + req.new_block_num = new_block;
>> +
>> + err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &req);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + dn = kmalloc(UBIFS_MAX_DATA_NODE_SZ, GFP_NOFS);
>> + if (!dn) {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto release_budget;
>> + }
>> +
>> + block_buf = kmalloc(sb->s_blocksize, GFP_NOFS);
>> + if (!block_buf) {
>> + err = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto free_dn;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (offset) {
>> + /* Write the un-aligned data in first block */
>> + tocopy = sb->s_blocksize - offset;
>> + if (towrite < tocopy)
>> + tocopy = towrite;
>
> See above.
>
>> + ret = ubifs_read_block(inode, block_buf, block, dn);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret != -ENOENT) {
>> + err = ret;
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> + memset(block_buf, 0, sb->s_blocksize);
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(block_buf + offset, data, tocopy);
>> +
>> + data_key_init(c, &key, inode->i_ino, block);
>> + err = ubifs_jnl_write_data(c, inode, &key, block_buf, sb->s_blocksize);
>
> Hmm, I'm confused. You write the block containing the quota information to an inode's data?
> How can be determined whether data is real data and what is quota data?
Ha, so we need a special writing function for quota file,
xxxfs_quota_write().
This function would bypass the quota recording, so quota
data would not be contained in by itself.
> This clearly shows that I know not much about the quota subsystem. 8^)
>
>> + if (err) {
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + }
>> + block++;
>> + towrite -= tocopy;
>> + data += tocopy;
>> + tocopy = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + while (towrite > 0) {
>> + tocopy = sb->s_blocksize < towrite ?
>> + sb->s_blocksize : towrite;
>> +
>> + /* Break to read the last block */
>> + if (tocopy < sb->s_blocksize)
>> + break;
>
> See above. Maybe you can combine all this common code.
Agree, thanx
>
>> + data_key_init(c, &key, inode->i_ino, block);
>> + err = ubifs_jnl_write_data(c, inode, &key, data, sb->s_blocksize);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto free_buf;
>> + block++;;
>
> See above.
>
> I'll review your other patches these days.
> For now I'm too sleepy.
Thanx a lot Richard.
Your review is always helpful to me.
Yang
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
> .
>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list