[PATCH v2 08/35] fs: introduce a __lookup_dev for internal using

[Jan Kara]

On Mon 03-08-15 22:08:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 30-07-15 13:48:04, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > This commit introduce a file of fs/dev.c at first. This is
> > a internal file shared by block_dev and char_dev. There is
> > only one function in it __lookup_dev which will be wrapped
> > to be lookup_bdev and loopup_cdev.
> > 
> > We will put more code in this file which is shared by
> > block_dev and char_dev.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/Makefile    |  2 +-
> >  fs/block_dev.c | 26 ++------------------
> >  fs/dev.c       | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/internal.h  | 14 +++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 fs/dev.c
> > 
> ...
> > +/**
> > + * __lookup_dev  - lookup a block_device or cdev by name
> > + * @pathname:	special file representing the device
> > + * @cdevp:	cdev would be returned by cdevp
> > + * @bdevp:	block_device would be returned by bdevp
> > + *
> > + * Get a reference to the block_deivce or cdev at @pathname in
> > + * the current namespace if possible and return it.
> > + */
> > +int __lookup_dev(const char *pathname, struct cdev **cdevp,
> > +	       struct block_device **bdevp)
> > +{
> > +	struct inode *inode;
> > +	struct path path;
> > +	int error = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (!pathname || !*pathname)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	error = kern_path(pathname, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path);
> > +	if (error)
> > +		return error;
> > +
> > +	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
> > +
> > +	/**
> > +	 * We need at least one of bdevp and cdevp to be NULL,
> > +	 * but cdevp and bdevp can not be both NULL.
> > +	 */
> > +	error = -EINVAL;
> > +	if (!(cdevp || bdevp) || (cdevp && bdevp))
> > +		goto out;
> 
> Why don't you allow both cdevp and bdevp to be set and in that case accept
> both block & character device and just set appropriate pointer and the
> other one to NULL? Then quota code wouldn't have to search twice...

On a second thought it's probably not worth the hassle with using the
function directly from quota code. So OK. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.com>

							Honza
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack at suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
-- 
Jan Kara <jack at suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR