Tiny delays in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
Richard Weinberger
richard.weinberger at gmail.com
Wed Apr 1 13:52:29 PDT 2015
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Mason <slash.tmp at free.fr> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c there are several instances of
> the following code:
>
> /*
> * Apply this short delay always to ensure that we do wait tWB in
> * any case on any machine.
> */
> ndelay(100);
>
>
> Is the intent to spin for 100 nanoseconds?
Yes. tWB is 100ns.
> It seems that, for most platforms, ndelay is defined as:
> udelay(DIV_ROUND_UP(x, 1000))
>
> So it will resolve to udelay(1) if I understand correctly?
If your kernel has the above definition, yes.
> (I suppose sleeping longer is not a problem.)
That covers my knowledge.
> However the comment implies that 100 ns are sufficient, right?
Spec wants tWB to be at least 100ns.
> So if I override ndelay with a function that sleeps *exactly*
> the amount requested, everything should keep working?
Yes.
> The reason I ask is because someone added this comment in my
> source tree:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TANGOX
> udelay(1); /* needs to make it much longer than tWB */
> #else
> ndelay(100);
> #endif
Looks fishy. Maybe this papers over a BSP bug.
> Also I have to figure out why the build is not picking up this
> definition for ndelay (from include/asm-generic/delay.h)
Not all archs use generic delay.h
HTH,
//richard
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list