[PATCH v2 1/3] nand: omap2: Add support for flash-based bad block table

Roger Quadros rogerq at ti.com
Tue Sep 9 06:33:21 PDT 2014


On 09/09/2014 04:27 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On 09 Sep 11:35 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Ezequiel,
>>
>> On 09/08/2014 02:27 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> This commit adds a new platform-data boolean property that enables use
>>> of a flash-based bad block table. This can also be enabled by setting
>>> the 'nand-on-flash-bbt' devicetree property.
>>
>> I'm not much aware of how on-flash-BBT works internally, but will it break things if
>> we keep on-flash-BBT "enabled" as the default option and add a DT property only to
>> explicitly disable the on-flash-BBT?
>>
> 
> No, that wouldn't work because the DT property already exists and it works to
> enable the flash BBT when it's present.
> 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
> 
> Of course, we can add a new no-nand-on-flash-bbt, but I really don't see the
> point. Users can just put the property in all the devicetree board files where
> it's needed.
> 
> And moreover, I don't want to change the default behavior of the driver; it's
> better to allow to *add* a new feature, if such feature is desired.
> Otherwise, users with some data in a flash's last blocks would be wiped and
> replaced with the BBT.
> 

OK. Let's stick with your patch then.

cheers,
-roger



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list