The future of ubi_assert()
Richard Weinberger
richard at nod.at
Wed Nov 5 14:02:22 PST 2014
Artem,
I'm not happy with ubi_assert().
Currently it only prints a warning and a stack trace but execution
continues. In production nobody will notice and while developing turning
it into a plain BUG_ON is most of the time more useful because execution stops
exactly where the boo boo happens one can analyze stack/registers.
I propose splitting ubi_assert() into two new functions.
1. ubi_bug_on()
Basically a BUG_ON(), it shall be used for assertions where execution of
UBI cannot proceed and anything we can do is crashing the machine.
2. ubi_warn_on()
This macro shall be used for assertions where further execution is possible
in read-only mode. ubi_warn_on() would be a WARN_ON() plus ubi_ro_mode().
I'm sure that the vast majority of all ubi_asserts() can be turned into a ubi_warn_on().
What do you think?
Thanks,
//richard
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list