[RFC/PATCH 0/5 v2] mtd:ubi: Read disturb and Data retention handling

Tanya Brokhman tlinder at codeaurora.org
Sun Nov 2 09:18:00 PST 2014


On 11/2/2014 7:02 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 02.11.2014 um 15:12 schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
>>> Back to topic.
>>> Storing the read-counters into fastmap also not a good idea because the fastmap can get lost completely (by design).
>>
>> yes,I'm aware of that. We have a default value for that case, and we're trying to avoid fastmap being invalid...
>
> Here be dragons. Can you please share these modifications?

nothing to share yet :) work in progress. more thought then code at this 
point. will share as soon as have something valid...

>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>


Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
-- 
Qualcomm Israel, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list