[PATCH v4 00/36] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Add new driver
Brian Norris
computersforpeace at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 20:46:13 EST 2014
Hi Lee,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:50:49PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Version 4:
> > Tended to Brian's previous review comments
> > - Checkpatch acceptance
> > - MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() name slip correction
> > - Timeout issue(s) resolved
> > - Potential infinite loop mitigated
> > - Code clarity suggests heeded
> > - Duplication with MTD core code removed
> > - Upgraded to using ROUND_UP() helper
> > - Moved non-shared header code into main driver
> > - Relocated dynamic msg sequence stores into main struct
> > - Averted adaption of static (table) data
> > - Basic whitespace/spelling/data type/dev_err suggestions accepted
> >
> > Version 3:
> > Okay, this thing should be fully functional now. Identify a chip
> > based on it's JEDEC ID, Read, Write, Erase (all or by sector).
> > Support for various chip quirks added too.
> >
> > Version 2:
> > The first bunch of these patches have been on the MLs before, but
> > didn't receive a great deal of attention for the most part. We are
> > a little more featureful this time however. We can now successfully
> > setup and configure the N25Q256. We still can't read/write/erase
> > it though. I'll start work on that next week and will provide it in
> > the next instalment.
> >
> > Version 1:
> > First stab at getting this thing Mainlined. It doesn't do a great deal
> > yet, but we are able to initialise the device and dynamically set it up
> > correctly based on an extracted JEDEC ID.
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/st-fsm.txt | 26 ++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2105.dts | 14 +
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-pinctrl.dtsi | 12 +
> > drivers/mtd/devices/Kconfig | 8 +
> > drivers/mtd/devices/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/mtd/devices/serial_flash_cmds.h | 81 ++++
> > drivers/mtd/devices/st_spi_fsm.c | 2124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 7 files changed, 2266 insertions(+)
>
> Can you confirm receipt of this set, or would you like me to resend?
Well, I personally have the patch set but haven't had a chance to review
it. Can you resend with MTD in the CC, since we haven't had any comments
anyway? I believe MTD people are much less likely to look at it if you
forget the CC :)
You can just title it [PATCH RESEND v4 X/Y], possibly with a LKML
link back to the original v4, if you want to help avoid confusion.
Brian
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list