[RFC PATCH v2 03/14] of: mtd: add documentation for nand-ecc-level property

[Grant Likely]

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi Grant, Boris:
>
> (BTW, dropped Russell, Rob Landley and some unrelated mailing lists from Cc,
> and added Thomas, Gregory and Rob Herring).
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> On 05/02/2014 12:15, Grant Likely wrote:
>> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> [..]
>> >>
>> >> Maybe we can discuss about it now?
>> >>
>> >>    nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength.
>> >>    nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength.
>> > I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable.
>>
>> That's fine by me, if everybody agrees, let's go for the
>> nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-size couple then.
>>
>
> Great. So, if some DT dictator^C^Cmaintainers can Ack this binding,
> I can send a new patchset, with pxa3xx-nand using it...
>
>> I'll rebase next version of my series on Ezequiel's patch providing
>> these OF helpers.
>>
>
> ... and then you can base on it?
>
> This is the original patchset:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58763

I've looked at both. Go ahead and add my a-b line:

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org>