[PATCH] mtd: m25p80: Make the name of mtd_info fixed

[Brian Norris]

Hi Hou,

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:29:41AM +0000, B48286 at freescale.com wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Norris [mailto:computersforpeace at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 10:12 AM
> > To: Hou Zhiqiang-B48286
> > Cc: linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-
> > B07421; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Ezequiel Garcia
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: m25p80: Make the name of mtd_info fixed
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 02:34:29PM +0800, Hou Zhiqiang wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
> > > @@ -1012,7 +1012,8 @@ static int m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > >  	if (data && data->name)
> > >  		flash->mtd.name = data->name;
> > >  	else
> > > -		flash->mtd.name = dev_name(&spi->dev);
> > > +		flash->mtd.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s.%d",
> > > +				id->name, spi->chip_select);
> > 
> > Changing the mtd.name may have far-reaching consequences for users who
> > already have mtdparts= command lines. But your concern is probably valid
> > for dynamically-determined bus numbers. Perhaps you can edit this patch
> > to only change the name when the busnum is dynamically-allocated?
> >
> It's a good idea, but in the case of mtd_info's name dynamically-allocated
> using "mtdparts=..." in command lines is illegal obviously.

I agree that users should never have relied on the dynamically-allocated
name. But changing the name for non-dynamic schemes (e.g., where the SPI
busnum is a fixed value) is not pleasant for users.

> Would you tell
> me what side-effect will be brought by the change of mtd_info's name.

I can only think of the mtdparts= command line. Otherwise, I don't think
the name is very important.

Brian