[PATCH 4/6] mtd: Introduce SPI NAND framework

[Ezequiel Garcia]

On 12/15/2014 06:18 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Ezequiel Garcia
> <ezequiel.garcia at imgtec.com> wrote:
>> +static int spi_nand_read_page(struct spi_nand *snand, unsigned int page_addr,
>> +                             unsigned int page_offset, size_t length)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned int corrected = 0, ecc_error = 0;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       /* Load a page into the cache register */
>> +       ret = snand->load_page(snand, page_addr);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               dev_err(snand->dev, "error %d loading page 0x%x to cache\n",
>> +                       ret, page_addr);
>> +               return ret;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ret = spi_nand_wait_till_ready(snand);
>> +       if (ret < 0)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>> +       if (snand->ecc) {
>> +               snand->get_ecc_status(ret, &corrected, &ecc_error);
>> +               snand->bitflips = corrected;
>> +
>> +               /*
>> +                * If there's an ECC error, print a message and notify MTD
>> +                * about it. Then complete the read, to load actual data on
>> +                * the buffer (instead of the status result).
>> +                */
>> +               if (ecc_error) {
>> +                       dev_err(snand->dev,
>> +                               "internal ECC error reading page 0x%x\n",
>> +                               page_addr);
>> +                       snand->mtd.ecc_stats.failed++;
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /* Get page from the device cache into our internal buffer */
>> +       ret = snand->read_cache(snand, page_offset, length, snand->data_buf);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               dev_err(snand->dev, "error %d reading page 0x%x from cache\n",
>> +                       ret, page_addr);
>> +               return ret;
>> +       }
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Should you increment snand->mtd.corrected by corrected in this function?
> 

Yes, it looks like I missed that.

Thanks for the feedback,
-- 
Ezequiel