[PATCH v6 0/3] mtd: nand: gpmi: add proper raw access support

[Boris Brezillon]

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:47:43 +0800
Huang Shijie <shijie.huang at intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:58:58AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> > 
> > On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 00:47:09 -0800
> > Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > This series provides an implementation for raw accesses taking care of
> > > > hidding the specific layout used by the GPMI controller.
> > > > 
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Boris
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v5:
> > > >  - rename gpmi_move_bits into gpmi_copy_bits
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v4:
> > > >  - fixed a few corner cases in gpmi_move_bits (tested it with:
> > > >    https://github.com/bbrezillon/gpmi-move-bits-test/blob/master/gpmi-move-bits-test.c)
> > > >  - add documentation and comments for the new gpmi functions
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v3:
> > > >  - add comments to the gpmi_move_bits function
> > > >  - extend raw read/write documentation
> > > >  - move last part of the raw_page_read function into a conditional block
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v2:
> > > >  - fixed a bug in gpmi_move_bits
> > > >  - add a raw_buffer field to be used when using raw access methods
> > > >    (experienced memory corruptions when directly using page_buffer_virt
> > > >    buffer)
> > > >  - add raw OOB access functions
> > > 
> > > Applied the series. Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Out of curiosity, what tests does gpmi-nand.c now pass/fail?
> > 
> > The oobtest is still failing. I started to debug it, but didn't have
> > enough time to make it work.
> > 
> > The nandbiterrs test is working, though I didn't manage to make the
> > incremental test fail (writing the same pattern 10000 times without
> > erasing the block between each write does not generate any bit flips) on
> > my SLC NAND: MT29F2G08ABAEAH4.
> > Can someone with another SLC NAND chip try it ?
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also, is it time to yank / fixup some of these comments from
> > > gpmi-nand.c?
> > 
> > I was asking myself the same question...
> > 
> > > 
> > >  ...
> > >  * FIXME: The following paragraph is incorrect, now that there exist
> > >  * ecc.read_oob_raw and ecc.write_oob_raw functions.
> > >  *
> > >  * Since MTD assumes the OOB is not covered by ECC, there is no pair of
> > >  * ECC-based/raw functions for reading or or writing the OOB. The fact that the
> > >  * caller wants an ECC-based or raw view of the page is not propagated down to
> > >  * this driver.
> > >  */
> > 
> > I guess we can remove them.
> > Huang can you confirm that the raw access functions introduced in this
> > series are covering what's described here ?
> I think we can remove these comments now.

Brian, do you want me to send this patch or are you taking care of it ?


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com