[PATCH v4 2/5] mtd: nand: Add NAND_ECC_HW_ON_DIE ECC-mode.

Brian Norris computersforpeace at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 00:24:01 PDT 2014


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 05:28:54PM -0600, David Mosberger wrote:
> Some Micron chips such as the MT29F4G16ABADAWP have an internal
> (on-die) ECC-controller that is useful when the host-platform doesn't
> have hardware-support for multi-bit ECC.  This patch adds
> NAND_ECC_HW_ON_DIE to support such chips when the driver detects that
> the on-die ECC controller is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Mosberger <davidm at egauge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |  133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/of/of_mtd.c          |    1 +
>  include/linux/mtd/nand.h     |    2 +
>  3 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index f145f00..7047e9f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,20 @@ static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_64 = {
>  		 .length = 38} }
>  };
>  
> +static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_64_on_die = {

This is not the only possible layout for on-die ECC. It's probably not
even the only one used by Micron, is it? What about larger page sizes,
for instance?

> +	.eccbytes = 32,
> +	.eccpos = {
> +		    8,  9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
> +		   24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
> +		   40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,
> +		   56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63},
> +	.oobfree = {
> +		{.offset =  4,	 .length = 4},
> +		{.offset = 20,	 .length = 4},
> +		{.offset = 36,	 .length = 4},
> +		{.offset = 52,	 .length = 4}}
> +};
> +
>  static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_128 = {
>  	.eccbytes = 48,
>  	.eccpos = {
> @@ -1258,6 +1272,105 @@ static int nand_read_subpage(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	return max_bitflips;
>  }
>  
> +static int check_read_status_on_die(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +				    struct nand_chip *chip, int page)
> +{
> +	int max_bitflips = 0;
> +	uint8_t status;
> +
> +	/* Check ECC status of page just transferred into NAND's page buffer: */
> +	chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_STATUS, -1, -1);
> +	status = chip->read_byte(mtd);
> +
> +	/* Switch back to data reading: */
> +	chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READMODE, -1, -1);
> +
> +	if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> +		/* Page has invalid ECC. */
> +		mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +	} else if (status & NAND_STATUS_REWRITE) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Simple but suboptimal: any page with a single stuck
> +		 * bit will be unusable since it'll be rewritten on
> +		 * each read...
> +		 */
> +		max_bitflips = mtd->bitflip_threshold;
> +	}
> +	return max_bitflips;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * nand_read_subpage_on_die - [REPLACEABLE] raw sub-page read function
> + * @mtd: mtd info structure
> + * @chip: nand chip info structure
> + * @data_offs: offset of requested data within the page
> + * @readlen: data length
> + * @bufpoi: buffer to store read data
> + */
> +static int nand_read_subpage_on_die(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +				    struct nand_chip *chip,
> +				    uint32_t data_offs, uint32_t readlen,
> +				    uint8_t *bufpoi, int page)
> +{
> +	int start_step, end_step, num_steps, ret;
> +	int data_col_addr;
> +	int datafrag_len;
> +	uint32_t failed;
> +	uint8_t *p;
> +
> +	/* Column address within the page aligned to ECC size */
> +	start_step = data_offs / chip->ecc.size;
> +	end_step = (data_offs + readlen - 1) / chip->ecc.size;
> +	num_steps = end_step - start_step + 1;
> +
> +	/* Data size aligned to ECC ecc.size */
> +	datafrag_len = num_steps * chip->ecc.size;
> +	data_col_addr = start_step * chip->ecc.size;
> +	p = bufpoi + data_col_addr;
> +
> +	failed = mtd->ecc_stats.failed;
> +
> +	ret = check_read_status_on_die(mtd, chip, page);
> +	if (ret < 0 || mtd->ecc_stats.failed != failed) {
> +		memset(p, 0, datafrag_len);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* If we read not a page aligned data */
> +	if (data_col_addr != 0)
> +		chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT, data_col_addr, -1);
> +
> +	chip->read_buf(mtd, p, datafrag_len);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * nand_read_page_on_die - [INTERN] read raw page data without ecc
> + * @mtd: mtd info structure
> + * @chip: nand chip info structure
> + * @buf: buffer to store read data
> + * @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
> + * @page: page number to read
> + */
> +static int nand_read_page_on_die(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> +				 uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
> +{
> +	uint32_t failed;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	failed = mtd->ecc_stats.failed;
> +
> +	ret = check_read_status_on_die(mtd, chip, page);
> +	if (ret < 0 || mtd->ecc_stats.failed != failed)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	chip->read_buf(mtd, buf, mtd->writesize);
> +	if (oob_required)
> +		chip->read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * nand_read_page_hwecc - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC based page read function
>   * @mtd: mtd info structure
> @@ -3069,6 +3182,7 @@ nand_onfi_detect_micron_on_die_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>  		 * If the chip has on-die ECC enabled, we kind of have
>  		 * to do the same...
>  		 */
> +		chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_HW_ON_DIE;

Nope. nand_base does not make choices about the ECC type to use; that's
the job of the low-level / hardware driver. Refer to my comment on the
first patch; drivers should opt into this somehow.

>  		pr_info("Using on-die ECC\n");
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -3985,6 +4099,25 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  		ecc->strength = ecc->bytes * 8 / fls(8 * ecc->size);
>  		break;
>  
> +	case NAND_ECC_HW_ON_DIE:
> +		/* nand_bbt attempts to put Bbt marker at offset 8 in

s/Bbt/BBT/

Also, please see Documentation/CodingStyle regarding the proper
multiline comment style.

> +		   oob, which is used for ECC by Micron

s/oob/OOB/

> +		   MT29F4G16ABADAWP, for example.  Fixed by not using
> +		   OOB for BBT marker.  */
> +		chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
> +		chip->ecc.layout = &nand_oob_64_on_die;
> +		chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_on_die;
> +		chip->ecc.read_subpage = nand_read_subpage_on_die;
> +		chip->ecc.write_page = nand_write_page_raw;
> +		chip->ecc.read_oob = nand_read_oob_std;
> +		chip->ecc.read_page_raw = nand_read_page_raw;
> +		chip->ecc.write_page_raw = nand_write_page_raw;
> +		chip->ecc.write_oob = nand_write_oob_std;
> +		chip->ecc.size = 512;
> +		chip->ecc.bytes = 8;
> +		chip->ecc.strength = 4;

This is all way too specific to the particular Micron flash you're
looking at. There are other vendors that use on-die ECC, and any support
here should be written to accommodate future additions (by Micron or
other vendors).

Particularly: the ECC strength/size should be determined per
vendor/flash, not here. Can you get this from ONFI or the ID? At least
the ecc.{strength,bytes,size} should probably be assigned from the
flash-vendor-specific callback.

> +		break;
> +
>  	case NAND_ECC_NONE:
>  		pr_warn("NAND_ECC_NONE selected by board driver. "
>  			   "This is not recommended!\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_mtd.c b/drivers/of/of_mtd.c
> index b7361ed..c844c84 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_mtd.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_mtd.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static const char *nand_ecc_modes[] = {
>  	[NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME]	= "hw_syndrome",
>  	[NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST]	= "hw_oob_first",
>  	[NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH]	= "soft_bch",
> +	[NAND_ECC_HW_ON_DIE]	= "hw_on_die",
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> index 780ab58..dbb99b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ extern int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len);
>  /* Status bits */
>  #define NAND_STATUS_FAIL	0x01
>  #define NAND_STATUS_FAIL_N1	0x02
> +#define NAND_STATUS_REWRITE	0x08

How "standard" is this? Is this a Micron-specific status bit? If so, we
should note that in a comment.

>  #define NAND_STATUS_TRUE_READY	0x20
>  #define NAND_STATUS_READY	0x40
>  #define NAND_STATUS_WP		0x80
> @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ typedef enum {
>  	NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME,
>  	NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST,
>  	NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH,
> +	NAND_ECC_HW_ON_DIE,
>  } nand_ecc_modes_t;
>  
>  /*

Brian



More information about the linux-mtd mailing list