[PATCH 1/7] UBI: fix refill_wl_user_pool()
Artem Bityutskiy
dedekind1 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 3 12:00:35 EDT 2013
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 17:53 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 03.10.2013 17:27, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 17:08 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 03.10.2013 17:00, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> >>> On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 15:55 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>>> If no free PEBs are available refill_wl_user_pool() must not
> >>>> return with -ENOSPC immediately.
> >>>> It has to block till produce_free_peb() produced a free PEB.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reported-and-Tested-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud at gmail.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard at nod.at>
> >>>
> >>> What is pool size, I wonder?
> >>
> >> Currently it's 25 (UBI_FM_WL_POOL_SIZE).
> >> If experience shows that 25 is too low/big we can change this constant.
> >> Maybe it's also worth making them configurable...
> >
> > I if it is a possible scenario that this function will not return until
> > 25 (or even 10) PEBs are erased?
> >
>
> Sure. It will try to gain up to 25 PEBs but return if it gets less.
> That's why a pool has a current and a max size.
So if erasing speed is say, 250ms, then it would take 6.25 seconds?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list