[PATCH 02/17] spi/spi.h: Add configure from slave support.

Sourav Poddar sourav.poddar at ti.com
Wed Nov 27 23:47:38 EST 2013


On Tuesday 26 November 2013 05:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:51:53PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>> On Tuesday 26 November 2013 03:59 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>> +	void	(*configure_from_slave)(struct spi_device *spi, u8 *val);
>>> Clearly this is far too unstructured to be useful, this is only ever
>>> going to work with one specific combination of slave and master since
>>> there's absolutely no semantics defined.
>> I thought "val" might be good enuf, and this can be filled with whatever
>> data that need to be used from slave into master(irrespective of
>> slave and master?).
> The name isn't the issue, it's the fact that you're passing a completely
> unspecified blob of data.
May be, what you are suggesting here is to we should define a flash 
information
structure and should pass that structure here ?




More information about the linux-mtd mailing list