[RFC "v2"] mtd: nand: reintroduce NAND_NO_READRDY as NAND_NEED_READRDY

[Brian Norris]

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Brian Norris
<computersforpeace at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is an attempt at a version 2 of Alexander's RFC patch. I feel like the
> original (per NAND chip type) option makes more sense than per driver (where
> Alexander sets this option only for the diskonchip driver). But it is certainly
> more invasive. And apparently, no one else needs this option (or at least, no
> one complains). Perhaps everyone has just moved beyond small-page NAND?

I'm sorry, I meant to send this is a reply to Alexander's patch. See
his RFC and RFC RESEND:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-March/046024.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-March/046159.html

Brian