[PATCH v2] mtd/nand: don't use {read,write}_buf for 8-bit transfers

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 17:47 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> index 7ccb3c5..8ee4ed1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> @@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ struct nand_buffers {
>   *                     flash device.
>   * @read_byte:         [REPLACEABLE] read one byte from the chip
>   * @read_word:         [REPLACEABLE] read one word from the chip
> + * @write_byte         [REPLACEABLE] write a single byte to the chip on the
> + *                     low 8 I/O lines
>   * @write_buf:         [REPLACEABLE] write data from the buffer to the chip
>   * @read_buf:          [REPLACEABLE] read data from the chip into the buffer
>   * @select_chip:       [REPLACEABLE] select chip nr
> @@ -503,6 +505,7 @@ struct nand_chip {
>  
>         uint8_t (*read_byte)(struct mtd_info *mtd);
>         u16 (*read_word)(struct mtd_info *mtd);
> +       void (*write_byte)(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t byte);
>         void (*write_buf)(struct mtd_info *mtd, const uint8_t *buf, int len);
>         void (*read_buf)(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, int len);
>         void (*select_chip)(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip);

I would like to make the interface symmetric for read and write. I do
not have any 16 bit flashes, so need to somehow encouredge someone who
has one to do this. Namely, I'd like to kill 'read_word()', if possible.
What's your take on this?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy