Re[2]: [PATCH 06/12] mtd: nand: remove a bunch of unused commands
Alexander Shiyan
shc_work at mail.ru
Mon Mar 4 14:29:27 EST 2013
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/cafe_nand.c | 6 ------
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 10 ----------
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c | 8 --------
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nuc900_nand.c | 9 ---------
> > include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 20 --------------------
> > 5 files changed, 53 deletions(-)
> >
>
> ... trimmed ...
...
> > - * Note: the command for NAND_CMD_DEPLETE1 is really 0x00 but
> > - * there is no way to distinguish that from NAND_CMD_READ0
> > - * until the remaining sequence of commands has been completed
> > - * so add a high order bit and mask it off in the command.
> > - */
> > -#define NAND_CMD_DEPLETE1 0x100
>
> Perhaps this is the reason for the "unnecessary command masking" noted
> by Alexander? There is one instance of a command function which masks
> command & 0xff. Maybe Alexander's patch can be updated to mention this
> likely cause for the original masking and can be applied on top of
> Artem's cleanup series? Anyway, the mask was likely not used anyway,
> since (as Artem mentions in this patch series) AG-AND had very little
> general use (or none?).
My patch is cleanup only. I think that the mask was originally included to
limit the byte boundaries. However, this is not necessary because callback
functions "cmd_ctrl" use writeb/iowrite8 for send command, ie do not allow
the use of the wrong size. Address also passed to "cmd_ctrl" via "cmd"
parameter, which is not masked but only shifted, i.e. we have a values
above 0xff, so that is not a problem.
---
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list