[PATCH v2] M25p80 little bugs

[wangyuhang]

Hi, Marek

Really sorry for the previous deformed patch.
And you are right, using devm_kzalloc looks better.
I have resended the patch, please help me review.
Thanks.

Signed-off-by: wangyuhang <wangyuhang2014 at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
index 5b6b072..70f3c54 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
@@ -955,15 +955,9 @@ static int m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 		}
 	}
 
-	flash = kzalloc(sizeof *flash, GFP_KERNEL);
+	flash = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof *flash, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!flash)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	flash->command = kmalloc(MAX_CMD_SIZE + (flash->fast_read ? 1 : 0),
-					GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!flash->command) {
-		kfree(flash);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
 
 	flash->spi = spi;
 	mutex_init(&flash->lock);
@@ -1032,6 +1026,11 @@ static int m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	flash->fast_read = true;
 #endif
 
+	flash->command = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev,
+		MAX_CMD_SIZE + (flash->fast_read ? 1 : 0), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!flash->command)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	if (info->addr_width)
 		flash->addr_width = info->addr_width;
 	else {
-- 
1.7.9.5