[PATCH 0/5 v3] at91: PMECC: enable PMECC in dt for at91sam9x5ek, at91sam9n12ek

[Olof Johansson]

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 01:47 PM, Josh Wu :
> > Those patches will enable PMECC in dt parameters for at91sam9x5ek and 
> > at91sam9n12ek.
> > 
> > The PMECC driver will check minimum required ecc on ONFI parameter from NAND 
> > flash.
> > 
> > If pmecc-cap, pmecc-sector-size in dts file is specified, use those two.
> > otherwise, set those according to NAND flash ONFI parameters.
> > 
> > If the pmecc-cap, pmecc-sector-size in dts are different with ecc requirement
> > in ONFI, print out a warning.
> > 
> > 
> > For the following compile error:
> >   ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pinctrl_ssc0_tx"
> > 
> >   ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
> >   make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek.dtb] Error 2
> > 
> > the fixes are already merged in Linux mainline in v3.8-rc4.
> > you can find in: 
> >  544ae6b2e676c3c37fb8c93ef9327932fc2e5bc2 (ARM: at91/dts: add pinctrl support for SSC peripheral)
> >  ea03c81521bde526570e1dec96eaa21fe5ac84a2 (ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl selection to driver) 
> 
> Artem,
> 
> I propose to take patches 2 and 3/5 of this series via arm-soc git tree.
> I will specify to merge them at the end of the merge-window so that the
> Device Tree properties will not be out-of-sync with driver modifications
> (may not cause big issues anyway).

I'm not cc:d on the patches, but if it's just new properties then there's
no reason to hold off to "late in the merge window". There's actually no
way for you to hold that off yourself, since we won't accept new patches
to arm-soc that late.

I don't see any cc to devicetree-discuss of the device tree bindings
though, and no update of Documentation/device-tree/bindings/, so the
patches are not ready to go in yet.


-Olof