Offtopic: ubifs and best practice for supporting browser based firmware upgrades

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 14:13 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From df2a498002498e52025acf51e0b43064d766aa0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:12:28 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] UBI: allow for delayed rename
> 
> Just an experimental patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com>

This have a lot of chances to work. If we do this, it would need to be
an extention to the existing ioctl, to preserve the original behaviour.
Something like a "delayed" flag, and then we can implement this in
ubirename as a --delayed option. Surely there may be better names for
this.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120926/84408e61/attachment.sig>