[RFC v2 PATCH 2/2] mtd: davinci - remove DaVinci architecture depedency

[Murali Karicheri]

On 11/07/2012 03:08 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 02:47 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> DaVinci NAND driver is a controller driver based on the AEMIF hardware
>> IP found on TI SoCs. It is also used on SoCs that are not DaVinci based. This
>> patch removes the driver dependency on DaVinci architecture so that it
>> can be used on other architectures such as c6x, keystone etc.
>>
>> Also migrate the driver to use the new AEMIF platform driver API and
>> moving Documentation to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/davinci-nand.txt
>> as this is expected to be used outside of arm/davinci.
>>   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/nand.txt
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/davinci-nand.txt
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/davinci-nand.h
> Using "git format-patch -M" might show this as a file move/rename rather
> than a delete/add, which would be useful to highlight any changes you
> made at the same time.
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/davinci-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/davinci-nand.txt
>> +Example (enbw_cmc board):
>> +aemif at 60000000 {
>> +	compatible = "ti,davinci-aemif";
>> +	#address-cells = <2>;
>> +	#size-cells = <1>;
>> +	reg = <0x68000000 0x80000>;
>> +	ranges = <2 0 0x60000000 0x02000000
>> +		  3 0 0x62000000 0x02000000
>> +		  4 0 0x64000000 0x02000000
>> +		  5 0 0x66000000 0x02000000
>> +		  6 0 0x68000000 0x02000000>;
>> +	nand at 3,0 {
> Here, isn't 3,0 the aemif chip-select ID that is decoding the NAND accesses?
>
Yes.
>> +		compatible = "ti,davinci-nand";
>> +		reg = <3 0x0 0x807ff
>> +			6 0x0 0x8000>;
>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>> +		#size-cells = <1>;
>> +		ti,davinci-chipselect = <1>;
> So I don't understand why that chipselect property is needed, or has a
> different value. Is this muxing the AEMIF output chip-selects onto
> different SoC package pins or something? Seems like a job for pinctrl
> perhaps?
Actually this was added by somebody else. Do you know what 0 in 3,0 
stands for? Is there a way I can retrieve the chip-select id so that I 
can remove the davinci-chipselect property. The driver uses a cs index 
of 0-3 and the hardware documentation refers CS2-5. Actually cs2 is CE0 
signal. So internally driver
translates to 2-5 to 0-3. pinmux is currently done in platform specific 
init code and probably need to migrate to use pictrl later.

Murali
>
>