[PATCH] [RFC] UBI: Implement Fastmap support

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 22:11 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> > In the error case, what are the consequences leaving the older
> on-flash
> >> > fastmap? Shouldn't it be invalidated?
> >>
> 
> After thinking a bit more about this case I think the best we can to
> is
> switching to read-only mode if ubi_update_fastmap()
> fails.
> 
Unless it fails because of -EIO, which means the PEB may become bad and
you need to pick a different one and schedule the faulty one for
torturing and marking as bad.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120524/d5d9f663/attachment.sig>