[PATCH] MTD: LPC32xx MLC NAND driver
Roland Stigge
stigge at antcom.de
Tue May 15 11:49:56 EDT 2012
Hi Russell!
Thanks for your notes!
On 05/15/2012 04:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:23:52PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> +static int lpc32xx_xmit_dma(struct mtd_info *mtd, dma_addr_t dma,
>> + void *mem, int len, enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
>> +{
>> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
>> + struct lpc32xx_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
>> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc;
>> + int flags = DMA_CTRL_ACK | DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT;
>> + int res;
>> + dma_cookie_t cookie;
>> +
>> + host->dma_slave_config.direction = dir;
>> + host->dma_slave_config.src_addr = dma;
>> + host->dma_slave_config.dst_addr = dma;
>> + if (dmaengine_slave_config(host->dma_chan, &host->dma_slave_config)) {
>> + dev_err(mtd->dev.parent, "Failed to setup DMA slave\n");
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + }
>
> The 'direction' argument should be ignored by all modern DMA engine
> drivers
Good - this way, I can move dmaengine_slave_config() to the dma_setup()
function, i.e., to probe().
However, I needed to set it there to some initial value (e.g., DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) -
otherwise the amba-pl08x driver didn't accept it. Is this a bug in the pl08x
driver?
Can we remove the .direction element from the struct dma_slave_config to prevent
others from making the same mistakes? Or is it useful for sth. else still?
>> +
>> + sg_init_one(&host->sgl, mem, len);
>> +
>> + res = dma_map_sg(host->dma_chan->device->dev, &host->sgl, 1, dir);
>
> Also note that dma transfer directions and dma data directions are
> different things. You shouldn't mix the two.
Thanks for pointing this out - I wasn't aware that the distinction between the
two is so important. Also consider e.g.:
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c:
/**
* dma_map_sg - map a set of SG buffers for streaming mode DMA
* @dev: valid struct device pointer, or NULL for ISA and EISA-like devices
* @sg: list of buffers
* @nents: number of buffers to map
* @dir: DMA transfer direction
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*
[...]
* Device ownership issues as mentioned for dma_map_single are the same
* here.
*/
int dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
enum dma_data_direction dir)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
;-)
Roland
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list