atmel_nand, DMA, and "Fall back to CPU I/O"

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 12:32 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> 
> And how might you recommend we use kmalloc()'ed memory, Artem? We
> can't really kmalloc() whole eraseblock-sized chunks. Or is there an
> inexpensive way of providing an intermediary kmalloc'ed buffer? I'm
> not too familiar at hacking at UBI(FS), but it might be worth a shot
> sometime, if you think it's reasonable.

This would need to change several places in UBI and UBIFS and switch
from continuous vmalloc buffers to iterating over an array of smaller
buffers.

I was thinking about this in the past but this is rather big project (a
months or a couple I'd say) so I did not have time to do this.

I think we basically need to switch to flexible arrays
(Documentation/flexible-arrays.txt), but last time I looked at this I
remember I decided that flexible arrays functionality would need to be
extended for our purposes.

If someone seriously is going to do this work, I am happy to discuss.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120503/6db58ebf/attachment.sig>