[PATCH v3 02/10] ARM: sh-mobile: mackerel: Add error IRQ resource

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 11:29 +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> 
> Am 03.05.2012 08:01 schrieb "Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind1 at gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 09:00 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 22:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, May 02, 2012, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> > > > > Supply the platform data for the FLSTEI error IRQ.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bastian Hecht <hechtb at gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > I'm going to take this patch into the renesas.git tree and push
> it
> > > > upstream throuch arm-soc, if that's not a problem.
> > >
> > > It is already in the MTD tree with the rest of the 10 patches...
> >
> > Ops, sorry, this is not true. Then Bastian should separate it out
> and
> > not send it to the MTD tree.
> 
> Alright I'll do. I need to fix the compiler warnings of the mtd
> patches anyway. So the board code is independant and can be pushed
> already by Rafael, right? How is it supposed to work in general? I
> think the sh-mobile list wants to be informed when I change something
> in the flctl code. Would the right approach be to send 2 patchsets -
> posted on both MLs so that Artem can take the mtd portions and Rafael
> the mackerel ones?

If the patches are completely independent, post them separately. I think
it is also OK to CC more than one mailing list.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120503/62ed9059/attachment.sig>