[PATCH 7/7] mtd: driver _read() returns max_bitflips; mtd_read() returns -EUCLEAN

[Shmulik Ladkani]

On Tue, 01 May 2012 10:27:14 -0700 Mike Dunn <mikedunn at newsguy.com> wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 05:20 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:55 -0700, Mike Dunn wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, sorry Artem, I neglected to add the Acked-by's in the patches you just merged.
> > 
> > If you know that an Acked-by or Reviewed-by was missed, let me know and
> > I'll add the tag(s) to the patch(es). I think it is important to be
> > careful about the tags because people spent their time helping to
> > improve the patches.
> 
> 
> Well, I owe a debt to several reviewers, among them Brian Norris (caught the bug
> that would cause all non-ecc devices to return -EUCLEAN), Shmulik Ladkani, Ivan
> Djelic (reviews and tests), Scott Wood, Robert Jarzmik, yourself, ...
> 
> As far as formal tags... maybe these, if they don't object:
> 
> mtd: driver _read() returns max_bitflips; mtd_read() returns -EUCLEAN
> 5568eb3c3bb2816281b6a7c04db92434b72b1495
> Tested-by: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic at parrot.com>
> 
> mtd: nand: read_page() returns max_bitflips
> 6bf87bf989bfdfc78fb2c5cd55de4bab9b572992
> Acked-by (freescale changes): Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> 
> If the others feel a tag credit is appropriate, I certainly don't mind.

On a side note (sorry for the off-topic post):

It seems the use of the formal tags is somewhat limited.

AFAIU, Acked-by is supposed to be specified by the maintainer or major
contributor, the one in charge of the code affected, and it could
be specified to just a part of the patch.

OTOH Reviewed-by can be specified by any interested reviewer, as an
indication that the entire patch has been reviewed.

However when patches get partially reviewed by interested parties, no
formal tag is suitable.

Regards,
Shmulik