mtd nand erase and bad block

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 16:05 +0100, Angus CLARK wrote:
> So, are you suggesting that I implement a MEMBBSCRUB ioctl, with a flag to
> indicate whether or not the BBTs should be updated (and some extra padding for
> future-proofing)?  Might have think about what happens when called on blocks
> reserved for the BBTs...

First of all, implement only what you really need and can test. Do not
try to implement too much of stuff you do not really need. Yes, the
above sounds good. And the BBT eraseblocks are not (and should not) be
directly accessible for erasure/scrubbing.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120716/0d14c353/attachment.sig>