[RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:40 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Notice, your patch-set has huge amount of checkpatch.pl complaints -
> > please fix them. This will also be consistent with the overall UBI
> > coding style where I honored checkpatch.pl limitations like identation
> > style and 80 chars per line.
> > 
> 
> All checkpatch.pl complaints will be fixed.
> But first we have to discuss and address real problems.

Note, I just have a maintainers script which takes the patch-set as
input, then checks bisectability, finds new warnings, checks with
sparse/smatch/coccinelle/checkpatch.pl etc. I just gave your patches to
my script and checkpatch.pl complaints were the only things identified
by the scripts.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20120229/8dc49cce/attachment-0001.sig>