[GIT PULL] logfs: bug fixes
Brian Norris
computersforpeace at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 14:02:58 EST 2012
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Artem Bityutskiy
<artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:50:07 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mtd: fix merge conflict resolution breakage
>
> This patch fixes merge conflict resolution breakage introduced by merge
> commit 'd3712b9dfcf44ca145cf87e7f4096fa2d923471a'.
>
> The commit changed 'mtd_can_have_bb()' function and made it always return
> zero, which is incorrect. Instead, we need it to return whether the
> underlying flash device can have bad eraseblocks or not. UBI needs this
> information because it affects how it handles the underlying flash.
> E.g., if the underlying flash is NOR, it cannot have bad blocks and any
> write or erase error is fatal, and all we can do is to switch to R/O
> mode. We do not need to reserve a pool of good eraseblocks for bad
> eraseblocks handling, and so on.
>
> This patch also removes 'mtd_can_have_bb()' invocations from Logfs
> to ensure correct Logfs behavior.
>
> I've tested that with this patch UBI works on top of NOR and NAND
> flashes emulated by mtdram and nandsim correspondingly.
>
> This patch is based on patch from Linus Torvalds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com>
This agrees with my suggestions.
Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com>
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list