[PATCH 1/6] nand_wait_ready timeout fix
Artem Bityutskiy
dedekind1 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 03:48:40 EDT 2011
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 18:26 +0200, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> nand_wait_ready timeout should not assume HZ=1000.
> Make it independent of HZ value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet at parrot.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index a46e9bb..a3c7fd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void panic_nand_wait_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned long timeo)
> void nand_wait_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
> - unsigned long timeo = jiffies + 2;
> + unsigned long timeo = jiffies + (2 * HZ) / 1000;
I agree that the code is buggy, but your fix is strange: if HZ = 100, (2
* HZ) / 1000 will be zero?
I think you should instead know for how many msecs you want to wait, and
use msecs_to_jiffies().
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list