[PATCH v3 0/7] prepare new nanddump options, defaults

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:37 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Are the "ubi-utils" and "tests" meant to have the option of compiling
> separately from the other mtd-utils?

Probably not.

> Are these tools ever distributed separately? If not, do they need to
> be independently buildable?

I do not think that we need ubi-utils to be buildable separately.

>  It looks to me like ubi-utils is dependent
> on first compiling "lib", but otherwise, they can all be built
> separately... Anyway, I think this kinda screws with the centralized
> VERSION thing above.
> Why is mtdinfo under ubi-utils? Perhaps it should be moved when it
> replaces flash_info? I think this is a fair interpretation of Item 3
> in the feature-removal plan...

Yeah, it can be moved.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)