[PATCH v3 0/7] prepare new nanddump options, defaults

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:04, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> And speaking about released, should we do a new one? If you see that
> some utils should have a version increased - feel free to do so. But
> even better we could make the version numbers to be the same as release
> number, then this process would be more automated and version would make
> some sense...

the version isnt encoded anywhere.  so if you started using something
like the kernel where the VERSION was in the Makefile, we could use
that to create a header file which all the utils would include.
-mike