[PATCH 0/2] small mtd-utils fixes

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:26, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 20:45 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> sure, but we're not taking about options here, we're talking about
>> required arguments:
>> ./make-release.sh <version> [output_dir]
>
> Yes, but my point was that this way is not very normal and not
> "standard" for Unix, at least by my perception of "standard".

for tools installed into $PATH and expected a little "higher" terms of
quality, then sure, it's not standard.  for tiny scripts in repo dirs
that serve specific functions, i think it's fairly common.

i think it should be the way i suggested, but i won't fight over it
too much ... i'm not the one making releases after all.
-mike