ubiformat: libmt error (side effect from last Large Buffer Allocations patch)
Artem Bityutskiy
dedekind1 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 04:37:23 EDT 2011
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 08:56 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have seen a side effect introduced with Grant's patch. I have applied
> the patchset and this fix the allocation problem in kernel.
I think it would be great to actually CC grant :-) So, this e-mail is
about this patch:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/034818.html
Grant, the original e-mail from Stefano:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/035190.html
> However, the result lenght can be an odd multiple of the minimum I/O
> size, and when there is not enough memory available, the introduced
> mtd_malloc_up_to_size() tries to allocate half the amount of requested
> size, getting a buffer not aligned with the minimum I/O size. The result
> is that the test in nand_base.c for the alignment fails:
Good catch! Shame on me to not foresee this issue. Thanks for reporting!
> IMHO mtd_malloc_up_to_size() must allocate a buffer aligned with the
> minimum I/O size. What about adding the I/O size as parameter to
> mtd_malloc_up_to_size, so the function will return always an aligned
> buffer ?
Yes, I think this is the right solution. I've cooked the following
patch, compile-tested only - please review and test.
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list