[PATCH 1/2][MTD]MLC device check in OneNAND driver
Artem Bityutskiy
dedekind1 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 24 04:39:53 EDT 2010
Hi,
few minor things. I could just do this all myself, but since this is not
the first non-perfect patch you send, I think I'll be a little nasty and
ask you should do the exercise :-)
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 17:26 +0530, Rohit Hassan Sathyanarayan wrote:
> Hi Artem,
>
> Adding driver check for MLC flash type.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit HS <rohit.hs at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Raghav Gupta <gupta.raghav at samsung.com>
1. Do no add extra line between the message and signed off.
2. Ideally, your patches should be applicable with git-am without the
need to edit them. Try git am for your patches and see the result -
the commit message will contain 'Hi Artem,' phrase, which should not
be there.
> ---
> drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
> index a2bb520..33e0dbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
> @@ -4027,7 +4027,7 @@ int onenand_scan(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips)
> mtd->ecclayout = this->ecclayout;
>
> /* Fill in remaining MTD driver data */
> - mtd->type = MTD_NANDFLASH;
> + mtd->type = ONENAND_IS_MLC(this) ? MTD_MLCNANDFLASH : MTD_NANDFLASH;
> mtd->flags = MTD_CAP_NANDFLASH;
> mtd->erase = onenand_erase;
> mtd->point = NULL;
The kernel does not compile with this patch. You should make this patch
the second, the first one should introduce MTD_MLCNANDFLASH.
The kernel has to be bisectable, you patches should not break
bisectability.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list