[PATCH 0/3] MTD: OneNAND: Fix OneNAND DMA error handling and 2KiB pagesize

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:35 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:27 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 11:55 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >> >> Kyungmin Park (3):
> >> >>       MTD: OneNAND: Remove unused cmd_map at s5pc110
> >> >>       MTD: OneNAND: Fix loop hang when DMA error at Samsung SoCs
> >> >>       MTD: OneNAND: Fix 2KiB pagesize handling at Samsung SoCs
> >> >>
> >> >>  drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c |   17 +++++++----------
> >> >>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > Taken patches 1 and 3, requested a change for patch 2. Pushed patches 1
> >> > and 3 to l2-mtd-2.6.git / dunno, thanks.
> >>
> >> To David, Artem,
> >> Can you include these patches to linux-2.6.36-rc4? since it's bug fixes.
> >>
> >> How do you think?
> >
> > Note, Linus nowadays tends to be stricter about what goes in -rc. Why
> > would the first patch be a fix deserving urgent merging?
> 
> There's no problem with s5pc110 since there's no DMA error. but new
> SOC s5pc210 has some problem with DMA.
> it occurs the DMA error and can't exit the loop. as it's decided to
> use the 2.6.36 for s5pc210 we need to fix it ASAP.
> 
> >
> > About the second patch, what if you was mistaken and 20msces is not
> > enough sometimes? Don't you afraid to introduce another bug with this?
> If it takes more then 20msec it's really slow device. I think I give
> the enough time to transfer 2KiB or 4KiB pagesize transfer at DMA.
> 
> I'll measure the real time, how much time taken at 2.6.35 kernel and
> give exact number.
> 
> >
> > Probably for 2.6.36 the older version of your patch can be merged, and
> > then you can add timeout support on top?
> 
> Now I implemented it as DMA polling method, but also implemented the
> DMA interrupt codes. as it's new implementation. I don't expect it
> can't merge at this windows. so send fixed codes.

I am not sure I completely understand what you mean. but lets play safe
and merge your original version, because it is small and just fixes the
problem. Adding timeout is an improvement, and for this very simple
reason it should not go to 2.6.36.

Please, clone my l2 tree
(http://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git), checkout the
'for-2.6.36' branch, add timeout, and send it to me as as a separate
independent patch. I'll take care of it then.

Would you do this please?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)