[Help] SST39VF6401B Support

[Guillaume LECERF]

2010/10/18 Guillaume LECERF <glecerf at gmail.com>:
> 2010/10/18 Wolfram Sang <w.sang at pengutronix.de>:
>>>    The 39VF*-B-Version flashes in the cfi_nopri_fixup_table don't work
>>> well in the current code.  Because of the mistaken use of
>>> command(0x30) in the 6th bus cycle, which should be 0x50. I think the
>>> 39VF*-B-Version flashes should be removed form the CFI probe mode. Or
>>> maybe the erase operation should be changed for the Compatibility.
>>
>> Or we put in a variable like the unlock-address?
>
> I'm OK with solution, that's what I try to implement atm, but I'm
> still looking for the right place to put this variable.

Hi.
Could you try the attached patches ?
Note: it's totally untested.

-- 
Guillaume LECERF
GeeXboX developer - www.geexbox.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: erase-command.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2777 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20101021/dff3b46e/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sst38vf640x.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 969 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20101021/dff3b46e/attachment-0001.obj>