[PATCH] jffs2: Move erasing from write_super to GC.

[Joakim Tjernlund]

David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote on 2010/05/19 12:05:31:
>
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 11:47 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > This looks like a typo and I had to change that to:
> > BUG_ON(spin_is_locked(&c->erase_completion_lock));
>
> Hm, no -- we want it to BUG() if the spinlock is _NOT_ locked.
>
> You're building on UP, without preemption or spinlock debugging. In that
> case, spinlocks are a no-op. So spin_trylock() _always_ succeeds, and
> spin_is_locked() always returns 0.
>
> It should be lockdep_assert_held(), I think.

Ah, now I remember. There was an discussion about this on LKML a while
ago.
But would not assert_spin_locked() be better? On the
other hand lockdep_assert_held() will work too. Depends on what you
want?

       Jocke