how to pre-screen patch submissions from a newbie janitor?

[Wolfram Sang]

>   however, since he's new to patch creation and submission, i offered
> to "vet" his patches first.  i realize that my vetting carries no
> weight on the MTD list, but given that i've submitted lots and lots of
> patches elsewhere, i can still at least sanity check what he comes up
> with before it hits the list.
> 
>   is there a canonical signage for that nowadays?  is it "Reviewed-By"
> or something like that?  so that by the time it gets to the MTD list,
> he would have done the "Signed-Off-By" and i'd sign off as a reviewer.
> is that the way it works?  or is there an alternative?  thanks.

Yes, that sounds like a good case for Reviewed-by. It will surely help these
patches knowing there is somebody with experience who already had a look at
(and in that case probably build-tested) them.

Looking forward to the series,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/attachments/20100519/265c2e3b/attachment.sig>