[PATCH 2/2] Creating helper func for block alignment verfication
Vimal Singh
vimal.newwork at gmail.com
Wed Jan 13 08:20:37 EST 2010
Please drop this patch. This patch breaks compilation. My bad...
I will be posting new version of this patch soon.
I apology for creating noise.
-vimal
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork at gmail.com> wrote:
>> From cde21be80002b49fb8baeb341e8ae5a1a2394cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh at ti.com>
>> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:11:47 +0530
>> Subject: [PATCH] Creating helper func for block alignment verfication
>>
>> These checks are fairly common in 'nand_erase_nand', 'nand_lock'
>> and 'nand_unlock' fucntions.
>>
>
> I just ran checkpatch.pl and this patch had an error.
> Corrected patch is below.
>
> -vimal
>
> From 310f7faa8f319bd9384512f7d5a7f13dcfbeebc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh at ti.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:11:47 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] Creating helper func for block alignment verfication
>
> These checks are fairly common in 'nand_erase_nand', 'nand_lock'
> and 'nand_unlock' functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh at ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 97 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 4e27426..c80cec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,37 @@ static int nand_do_write_oob(struct
> */
> DEFINE_LED_TRIGGER(nand_led_trigger);
>
> +static int block_alignment_verification(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> + loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
> +
> + DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL3, "%s: start = 0x%012llx, len = %llu\n",
> + __func__, (unsigned long long)ofs, len);
> +
> + /* Start address must align on block boundary */
> + if (ofs & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> + DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Unaligned address\n", __func__);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Length must align on block boundary */
> + if (len & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> + DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Length not block aligned\n",
> + __func__);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Do not allow past end of device */
> + if (ofs + len > mtd->size) {
> + DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Past end of device\n",
> + __func__);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * nand_release_device - [GENERIC] release chip
> * @mtd: MTD device structure
> @@ -894,28 +925,8 @@ int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info
> int chipnr;
> struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
>
> - /* Start address must align on block boundary */
> - if (ofs & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Unaligned address\n", __func__);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /* Length must align on block boundary */
> - if (len & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Length not block aligned\n",
> - __func__);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + if (block_alignment_verification(mtd, ofs, len))
> goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /* Do not allow past end of device */
> - if (ofs + len > mtd->size) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Past end of device\n",
> - __func__);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
>
> /* Align to last block address if size addresses end of the device */
> if (ofs + len == mtd->size)
> @@ -968,31 +979,8 @@ int nand_lock(struct mtd_info
> int chipnr, status, page;
> struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
>
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL3, "%s: start = 0x%012llx, len = %llu\n",
> - __func__, (unsigned long long)ofs, len);
> -
> - /* Start address must align on block boundary */
> - if (ofs & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Unaligned address\n", __func__);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /* Length must align on block boundary */
> - if (len & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Length not block aligned\n",
> - __func__);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + if (block_alignment_verification(mtd, ofs, len))
> goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /* Do not allow past end of device */
> - if (ofs + len > mtd->size) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Past end of device\n",
> - __func__);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
>
> nand_get_device(chip, mtd, FL_LOCKING);
>
> @@ -2495,25 +2483,8 @@ int nand_erase_nand(struct
> __func__, (unsigned long long)instr->addr,
> (unsigned long long)instr->len);
>
> - /* Start address must align on block boundary */
> - if (instr->addr & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Unaligned address\n", __func__);
> + if (block_alignment_verification(mtd, instr->addr, instr->len))
> return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - /* Length must align on block boundary */
> - if (instr->len & ((1 << chip->phys_erase_shift) - 1)) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Length not block aligned\n",
> - __func__);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - /* Do not allow erase past end of device */
> - if ((instr->len + instr->addr) > mtd->size) {
> - DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0, "%s: Erase past end of device\n",
> - __func__);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
>
> instr->fail_addr = MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN;
>
> --
> 1.5.5
>
--
Regards,
Vimal Singh
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list