[PATCH 1/1] mtd: nand: move the checking the validity of oob into nand_write_oob

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:18 +0800, Stanley.Miao wrote:
> nand_write_oob will invoke nand_do_write_oob or nand_do_write_ops depending
> on if ops->datbuf is NULL. nand_do_write_oob checked the validity of oob
> but nand_do_write_ops didn't. Now move the check into nand_write_oob to
> ensure the validity of oobbuf.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley.Miao <stanley.miao at windriver.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 8f2958f..29e2a06 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -2113,40 +2113,9 @@ static int nand_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
>  static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
>  			     struct mtd_oob_ops *ops)
>  {

...

> @@ -2203,6 +2172,42 @@ static int nand_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (ops->oobbuf) {
> +		int len;
> +		DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL3, "%s: to = 0x%08x, ooblen = %i\n",
> +				__func__, (unsigned int)to, (int)ops->ooblen);

Why this check is not done for !obs->oobbuf cas as well?


-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)