Bad assumption about ID field definition for Samsung NAND?
cernekee at gmail.com
Thu Aug 19 15:46:35 EDT 2010
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Tilman Sauerbeck
<tilman at code-monkey.de> wrote:
>> This patch uses the new 6-byte scheme if the following conditions are
>> all true:
>> 3) 6th byte is zero
> ... but what the code does is use new scheme if id_data is _not_
ID for Samsung K9GAG08U0D (6-byte sequence): ec d5 94 29 34 41
The code is right; the comment is wrong.
More information about the linux-mtd