[PATCH] [MTD] Fix JFFS2 sync silent failure
Jens Axboe
jens.axboe at oracle.com
Thu Apr 22 06:39:53 EDT 2010
On Thu, Apr 22 2010, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22 2010, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 April 2010 12:20:56 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks, we definitely should have put a debug statement to catch this in
> > > from day 1, good debugging should be an important part of any new
> > > infrastructure.
> >
> > Woke up early and had another look at this. Looks like a much more
> > widespread problem. Based on a quick grep an uncaffeinated brain:
> >
> > 9p no s_bdi
> > afs no s_bdi
> > ceph creates its own s_bdi
> > cifs no s_bdi
> > coda no s_bdi
> > ecryptfs no s_bdi
> > exofs no s_bdi
> > fuse creates its own s_bdi?
> > gfs2 creates its own s_bdi?
> > jffs2 patch exists
> > logfs fixed now
> > ncpfs no s_bdi
> > nfs creates its own s_bdi
> > ocfs2 no s_bdi
> > smbfs no s_bdi
> > ubifs creates its own s_bdi
> >
> > I excluded all filesystems that appear to be read-only, block device
> > based or lack any sort of backing store. So there is a chance I have
> > missed some as well.
>
> It's funky, I was pretty sure there was/is code to set a default bdi for
> non-bdev file systems. It appears to be missing, that's not good. So
> options include:
>
> - Add the appropriate per-sb bdi for these file systems (right fix), or
> - Pre-fill default_backing_dev_info as a fallback ->s_bdi to at least
> ensure that data gets flushed (quick fix)
>
> I'll slap together a set of fixes for this.
Here's a series for fixing these. At this point they are totally
untested except that I did compile them. Note that your analysis
appeared correct for all cases but ocfs2, which does use get_sb_bdev()
and hence gets ->s_bdi assigned.
You can see them here, I'll post the series soon:
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-linus
The first patch is a helper addition, the rest are per-fs fixups.
--
Jens Axboe
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list