attaching UBI while getting read errors from NAND driver fails.
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
sebastian at breakpoint.cc
Tue Apr 20 14:44:12 EDT 2010
Attaching empty nand with a block which contains a RS-Error which can't
be fixed:
| UBI: attaching mtd9 to ubi0
| UBI: physical eraseblock size: 131072 bytes (128 KiB)
| UBI: logical eraseblock size: 129024 bytes
| UBI: smallest flash I/O unit: 2048
| UBI: sub-page size: 512
| UBI: VID header offset: 512 (aligned 512)
| UBI: data offset: 2048
| UBI error: ubi_io_read: error -74 while reading 64 bytes from PEB 3399:0, read 64 bytes
| Call Trace:
| [cfbd5c60] [c0008558] show_stack+0x48/0x19c (unreliable)
| [cfbd5ca0] [c01a71e8] ubi_io_read+0x188/0x288
| [cfbd5cf0] [c01a76e8] ubi_io_read_ec_hdr+0x74/0x2a4
| [cfbd5d20] [c01abe9c] ubi_scan+0x178/0x10b4
| [cfbd5d80] [c01a1464] ubi_attach_mtd_dev+0x67c/0xe44
| [cfbd5e80] [c01a1fc8] ctrl_cdev_ioctl+0x178/0x210
| [cfbd5ec0] [c008711c] do_ioctl+0x3c/0xc4
| [cfbd5ee0] [c0087224] vfs_ioctl+0x80/0x448
| [cfbd5f10] [c008762c] sys_ioctl+0x40/0x88
| [cfbd5f40] [c000f960] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
| UBI error: ubi_read_volume_table: the layout volume was not found
| UBI error: ubi_attach_mtd_dev: failed to attach by scanning, error -22
ubi_io_read() calls ubi->mtd->read() which ends in nand_do_read_ops() at
some point. The NAND controller was not able to read the page and
incremented mtd->ecc_stats.failed. The tail of nand_do_read_ops():
| if (mtd->ecc_stats.failed - stats.failed)
| return -EBADMSG;
So we return with -EBADMSG as you can see in the error message. This
error is then converted by ubi_io_read() into -EIO:
| /*
| * The driver should never return -EBADMSG if it failed to read
| * all the requested data. But some buggy drivers might do
| * this, so we change it to -EIO.
| */
| if (read != len && err == -EBADMSG) {
| ubi_assert(0);
| err = -EIO;
| }
At this point we leave ubi_scan() and the mtd partition remains
unattached. No really sure how we ended up with -EINVAL in
ubi_attach_mtd_dev().
I guess this is not wanted, is it?
The following patch led to:
| UBI: empty MTD device detected
| UBI: create volume table (copy #1)
| UBI: create volume table (copy #2)
| UBI: attached mtd9 to ubi0
| UBI: MTD device name: "ubi"
| UBI: MTD device size: 512 MiB
| UBI: number of good PEBs: 4092
| UBI: number of bad PEBs: 4
| UBI: max. allowed volumes: 128
| UBI: wear-leveling threshold: 4096
| UBI: number of internal volumes: 1
| UBI: number of user volumes: 0
| UBI: available PEBs: 4048
| UBI: total number of reserved PEBs: 44
| UBI: number of PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 40
| UBI: max/mean erase counter: 0/0
| UBI: image sequence number: 0
| UBI: background thread "ubi_bgt0d" started, PID 1986
ubimkvol gave me:
| UBI error: ubi_io_read: error -74 while reading 64 bytes from PEB 3399:0, read 64 bytes
| nand_erase: Failed erase, page 0x000751c0
| nand_erase: Failed erase, page 0x000751c0
| nand_erase: Failed erase, page 0x000751c0
| nand_erase: Failed erase, page 0x000751c0
| UBI error: do_sync_erase: cannot erase PEB 3399, error -5
| UBI error: erase_worker: failed to erase PEB 3399, error -5
| UBI: mark PEB 3399 as bad
| UBI: 39 PEBs left in the reserve
This looks good so far I guess. Is there much I break with patch? Should
this case be handled at another level?
Sebastian
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
index 533b1a4..710d069 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
@@ -181,10 +181,12 @@ retry:
* all the requested data. But some buggy drivers might do
* this, so we change it to -EIO.
*/
+#if 0
if (read != len && err == -EBADMSG) {
ubi_assert(0);
err = -EIO;
}
+#endif
} else {
ubi_assert(len == read);
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c
index dc5f688..7529d46 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c
@@ -756,7 +756,8 @@ static int process_eb(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si,
bitflips = 1;
}
- si->is_empty = 0;
+ if (err != UBI_IO_BAD_EC_HDR)
+ si->is_empty = 0;
if (!ec_corr) {
int image_seq;
@@ -827,6 +828,7 @@ static int process_eb(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si,
return err;
goto adjust_mean_ec;
}
+ si->is_empty = 0;
vol_id = be32_to_cpu(vidh->vol_id);
if (vol_id > UBI_MAX_VOLUMES && vol_id != UBI_LAYOUT_VOLUME_ID) {
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list