[PATCH] Fix Oops with Atmel SPI
Iwo Mergler
iwo at call-direct.com.au
Thu Apr 15 03:32:14 EDT 2010
Hi Anders,
Anders Larsen wrote:
> Hi Iwo,
>
> On 2010-04-14 09:30:41, Iwo Mergler wrote:
>> I wouldn't recommend that. MTD erase blocks are 64K or more. In a typical
>> embedded system you will not be able to kmalloc that much memory after
>> a few day's of operation - the page pool gets fragmented.
>
> the original problem occurs with SPI flashes, which typically have a much
> smaller erase block size (and it only occurs when they are driven by an Atmel
> SoC SPI controller, hence the #ifdefs)
>
>> A possibly better approach is to arrange for that memory to get allocated
>> at driver start time.
>
> The buffer in question is indeed allocated _once_ (at the first write
> operation to the device) and only deallocated when the device is unmounted,
> so allocating it at driver load time wouldn't make much difference IMHO.
>
I'm sorry, I thought you were somewhere else in the MTD source.
The bad block handling code for NAND also has a full erase block
allocation, which happens during runtime.
You are correct in that the mount time allocation should be
safe, for most systems.
Best regards,
Iwo
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list