[PATCH] JFFS2: min/max confusion?
Roel Kluin
roel.kluin at gmail.com
Sat Nov 21 10:34:36 EST 2009
MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE was meant as a limit, not as a minimum
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin at gmail.com>
---
fs/jffs2/summary.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
unless I am mistaken?
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/summary.c b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
index 6caf1e1..800171d 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/summary.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
int jffs2_sum_init(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
{
- uint32_t sum_size = max_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);
+ uint32_t sum_size = min_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);
c->summary = kzalloc(sizeof(struct jffs2_summary), GFP_KERNEL);
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list