[PATCH 1/3] Fixing compilation warning for 'nand/omap2.c'

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 14:31 +0530, Vimal Singh wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> >> index 090ab87..92573d5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> >> @@ -501,11 +501,13 @@ static void omap_read_buf_dma_pref(struct
> >> mtd_info *mtd, u_char
> >
> > :-) It is the same again.
> >
> > Try to send the e-mail to yourself, then save it and apply with git-am.
> > If it works, send to the mailing list.
> 
> Below patch applies. Sorry for noise... :(
> 
> Thanks,
> vimal
> 
> 
> From eebbd81141b196af2dc3f7a2650ce16b6b0d76ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh at ti.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:31:34 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] Fixing compilation warning for 'nand/omap2.c'
> 
> Fixing below warning in compilation:
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c: In function 'omap_write_buf_dma_pref':
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c:508: warning: passing argument 2 of
> 'omap_nand_dma_transfer' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh at ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> index 090ab87..92573d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> @@ -501,11 +501,13 @@ static void omap_read_buf_dma_pref(struct
>  static void omap_write_buf_dma_pref(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>  					const u_char *buf, int len)
>  {
> +	u_char *p = (u_char *)buf;
> +
>  	if (len <= mtd->oobsize)
> -		omap_write_buf_pref(mtd, buf, len);
> +		omap_write_buf_pref(mtd, p, len);
>  	else
>  		/* start transfer in DMA mode */
> -		omap_nand_dma_transfer(mtd, buf, len, 0x1);
> +		omap_nand_dma_transfer(mtd, p, len, 0x1);
>  }
> 
>  /**

BTW, this patch is still corrupted for me. And it is strange that I do
not see it in the archives, so I cannot check is this my setup which is
guilty, or it is you sending the patches incorrectly:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-November/027918.html

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)